Write the names of four States that accepted the ‘Subsidiary Alliance’.

by

Points to Remember:

  • The Subsidiary Alliance was a key British policy in India during the 18th and 19th centuries.
  • It involved Indian states entering into alliances with the British East India Company.
  • The alliance came with conditions that often led to the erosion of Indian states’ sovereignty.
  • Several Indian states accepted the Subsidiary Alliance, albeit under duress in many cases.

Introduction:

The Subsidiary Alliance was a cornerstone of the British East India Company’s expansionist policy in India. Implemented primarily during the period of Lord Wellesley’s governorship (1798-1805), it involved the British offering protection to Indian princely states in exchange for a substantial military subsidy and the right to station British troops within their territories. While presented as a mutually beneficial arrangement, the alliance often resulted in the gradual subjugation of Indian states, ultimately leading to the erosion of their autonomy and sovereignty. This policy was a significant factor in the British consolidation of power across the Indian subcontinent. This answer will identify four states that accepted this alliance.

Body:

Four States that Accepted the Subsidiary Alliance:

The Subsidiary Alliance, while seemingly offering protection, often came with coercive pressure. Many states, facing threats from other powers or internal instability, were compelled to accept the terms. Four prominent examples include:

  1. Hyderabad: The Nizam of Hyderabad, under pressure from the British, accepted the Subsidiary Alliance in 1798. This agreement led to the stationing of British troops in Hyderabad and the payment of a substantial subsidy, significantly impacting the Nizam’s autonomy.

  2. Mysore: Following the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799), the defeated Mysore kingdom was forced to accept the Subsidiary Alliance. The treaty significantly reduced Mysore’s independence, paving the way for greater British control over its affairs.

  3. Travancore: Travancore, a relatively powerful South Indian kingdom, also entered into a Subsidiary Alliance with the British. This alliance, while initially seen as a means of protection against potential threats, ultimately led to a gradual decline in Travancore’s sovereignty.

  4. Awadh (Oudh): The Nawab of Awadh, facing internal challenges and external threats, was compelled to accept the Subsidiary Alliance. This agreement resulted in the stationing of British troops within Awadh and the payment of a substantial subsidy, gradually diminishing the Nawab’s power and leading to the eventual annexation of the state by the British.

Conclusion:

The Subsidiary Alliance, while presented as a protective measure, served as a crucial tool for the British East India Company’s expansion in India. The four states mentioned – Hyderabad, Mysore, Travancore, and Awadh – represent a small fraction of the numerous Indian states that were drawn into this system. The alliance, while initially offering a semblance of security, ultimately led to the erosion of their sovereignty and paved the way for the British to consolidate their control over the Indian subcontinent. The legacy of the Subsidiary Alliance serves as a stark reminder of the complexities of power dynamics and the importance of maintaining national sovereignty. Understanding this historical context is crucial for appreciating the complexities of India’s colonial past and its subsequent journey towards independence. A balanced approach to historical analysis, acknowledging both the perspectives of the British and the Indian states, is essential for a complete understanding of this pivotal period in Indian history.

UKPCS Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for UKPCS Prelims and UKPCS Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by UKPCS Notes are as follows:- For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry––