What is the âNine-dash Lineâ? Why is it a bone of contention?

Points to Remember:

The Nine-Dash Line’s historical context and evolving interpretations.
The legal basis (or lack thereof) for the Nine-Dash Line.
The conflicting claims and territorial disputes it generates.
The international legal framework governing maritime boundaries.
The potential for conflict and the importance of peaceful resolution.

Introduction:

The “Nine-Dash Line” is a demarcation line used by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to claim sovereignty over most of the South China Sea. This U-shaped line encompasses vast swathes of ocean, including numerous islands, reefs, and potentially significant resources like oil and gas. It’s not a clearly defined legal boundary, and its historical origins are contested, making it a major source of regional tension and a significant bone of contention in international relations. The lack of transparency surrounding its creation and the PRC’s assertive actions within the claimed area have fueled considerable international criticism.

Body:

1. Historical Context and Evolution:

The Nine-Dash Line’s origins trace back to maps produced by the Republic of China (ROC) in the 1940s, initially using eleven dashes. These maps were not accompanied by clear legal justifications or declarations of sovereignty. Over time, the number of dashes was reduced to nine, and the line’s interpretation has evolved, becoming increasingly expansive under the PRC. The lack of clear historical documentation and the ambiguity surrounding its initial purpose contribute to the ongoing dispute.

2. Legal Basis and International Law:

The PRC’s claim based on the Nine-Dash Line lacks a strong legal foundation under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which establishes a framework for maritime delimitation based on objective criteria. UNCLOS emphasizes the principle of coastal state sovereignty extending to a 12-nautical mile territorial sea and an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) extending up to 200 nautical miles. The Nine-Dash Line, however, significantly exceeds these limits and overlaps with the claimed maritime territories of several other nations, including Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan. The Permanent Court of Arbitration’s 2016 ruling in the case of Philippines v. China rejected the PRC’s claim based on the Nine-Dash Line, stating that it has no basis in international law.

3. Conflicting Claims and Territorial Disputes:

The Nine-Dash Line fuels numerous overlapping claims and territorial disputes over islands, reefs, and resources within the South China Sea. These disputes often involve competing claims to fishing rights, hydrocarbon reserves, and strategic maritime passages. The PRC’s construction of artificial islands and military installations within the claimed area has further escalated tensions, raising concerns about freedom of navigation and regional stability. Several incidents involving Chinese coast guard vessels and fishing fleets have led to confrontations with other claimant states.

4. International Responses and Efforts for Peaceful Resolution:

The international community, through organizations like ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) and the UN, has repeatedly called for peaceful resolution of the South China Sea disputes through dialogue and adherence to international law. However, the PRC’s assertive stance and its reluctance to fully engage in binding arbitration have hampered progress. Several countries have conducted freedom of navigation operations to challenge the PRC’s claims, further complicating the situation.

Conclusion:

The Nine-Dash Line remains a significant source of tension and instability in the South China Sea. Its lack of legal basis under UNCLOS and its incompatibility with the principles of international law are widely recognized. The overlapping claims and assertive actions by the PRC have created a volatile security environment. A way forward requires a commitment from all parties to peaceful resolution through dialogue, adherence to UNCLOS, and respect for the rule of international law. A regional code of conduct, based on mutual respect and transparency, could help manage disputes and prevent escalation. Ultimately, a sustainable solution necessitates prioritizing regional stability and cooperation over unilateral assertions of power, fostering a future where the South China Sea is a zone of peace and prosperity, upholding the principles of international law and ensuring freedom of navigation for all.

UKPCS Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for UKPCS Prelims and UKPCS Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by UKPCS Notes are as follows:-

For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry––