Explain why Iodine forms 3I⁻ ion, while Fluorine does not form 3F⁻ ion?

by

Points to Remember:

  • Electron configuration and valence electrons
  • Ionic radii and electron-electron repulsion
  • Ionization energy and electronegativity

Introduction:

The formation of anions (negatively charged ions) depends primarily on the element’s electronic structure and its ability to accept electrons. Both iodine (I) and fluorine (F) are halogens, belonging to Group 17 of the periodic table, and readily gain electrons to achieve a stable octet configuration. However, they differ significantly in their ability to form polyanions like I₃⁻. This difference stems from their atomic size and the resulting electron-electron repulsions within the anion.

Body:

1. Electronic Configuration and Valence Electrons:

Both iodine and fluorine have seven valence electrons. Gaining one electron would complete their octet, forming I⁻ and F⁻, respectively. Fluorine, being highly electronegative, strongly attracts electrons and readily forms the stable F⁻ ion. Iodine, while also electronegative, is significantly larger than fluorine. This larger size allows it to accommodate additional electrons, albeit with less stability.

2. Ionic Radii and Electron-Electron Repulsion:

Fluorine is a small atom, and the F⁻ ion is even smaller. Adding another electron to form a hypothetical F₃⁻ ion would result in significant electron-electron repulsion within the small ionic radius. This repulsion would destabilize the ion, making its formation highly unfavorable. In contrast, iodine is a much larger atom. The I⁻ ion is considerably larger, providing more space to accommodate additional electrons with relatively less repulsion. This allows for the formation of the triiodide ion (I₃⁻).

3. Ionization Energy and Electronegativity:

Fluorine has a very high electronegativity and ionization energy. This means it strongly attracts electrons and resists losing them. The energy required to add a second or third electron to fluorine would be extremely high, making the formation of polyanions energetically unfavorable. Iodine, while still electronegative, has lower ionization energy and electronegativity compared to fluorine. This makes it relatively easier to add additional electrons to form I₃⁻, although the stability is less than that of I⁻.

4. The Structure of I₃⁻:

The triiodide ion (I₃⁻) is linear in shape, with the central iodine atom sharing electrons with the two terminal iodine atoms through a three-center four-electron bond. This bonding arrangement helps to distribute the negative charge and mitigate electron-electron repulsion, making the formation of I₃⁻ possible. Such a bonding arrangement is not feasible for fluorine due to its small size and strong electron-electron repulsion.

Conclusion:

In summary, the inability of fluorine to form F₃⁻, unlike iodine’s ability to form I₃⁻, is primarily due to the significant difference in their atomic sizes. Fluorine’s small size leads to strong electron-electron repulsion, making the addition of more than one electron energetically unfavorable. Iodine’s larger size allows for the accommodation of additional electrons with less repulsion, facilitating the formation of the triiodide ion through a three-center four-electron bond. This highlights the crucial role of atomic size and electron-electron repulsion in determining the stability of polyatomic ions. Further research into the synthesis and properties of polyhalide ions continues to offer valuable insights into chemical bonding and reactivity. Understanding these fundamental principles is essential for advancements in various fields, including materials science and chemical engineering.

UKPCS Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for UKPCS Prelims and UKPCS Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by UKPCS Notes are as follows:- For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry––