Points to Remember:
- Amendment process involves two stages: initiation and ratification.
- Different types of amendments require different majorities.
- Judicial review plays a crucial role in interpreting the amendment process.
- The amendment process balances stability and flexibility.
Introduction:
The Indian Constitution, a voluminous document outlining the framework of the Indian government, is not static. It incorporates a mechanism for its own amendment to adapt to evolving societal needs and circumstances. Article 368 of the Constitution outlines the procedure for amending the Constitution, a process that reflects a delicate balance between preserving the fundamental structure of the Constitution and allowing for necessary changes. The amendment process is not merely a technical exercise; it is a crucial aspect of India’s constitutional democracy, impacting the very fabric of its governance and the rights of its citizens.
Body:
1. Initiation of an Amendment:
An amendment to the Constitution can be initiated by either House of Parliamentâthe Lok Sabha (House of the People) or the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). There is no restriction on which House can initiate an amendment, although historically, significant amendments have often originated in the Lok Sabha. The amendment bill is introduced like any other bill, requiring a simple majority (more than half of the members present and voting).
2. Ratification of an Amendment:
This is the crucial second stage. The type of majority required for ratification depends on the nature of the amendment:
- Simple Majority: Amendments related to matters not specified in Article 368 require only a simple majority in both Houses of Parliament.
- Special Majority: Amendments affecting the federal structure (e.g., those altering the distribution of powers between the Union and the States), fundamental rights, or the electoral system require a special majority. This involves a majority of the total membership of each House and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of each House present and voting.
- Ratification by States: Amendments related to certain specific provisions, such as those affecting the federal structure or the representation of States in Parliament, require ratification by at least half of the States in addition to the special majority in Parliament. This reflects the federal character of the Indian Constitution.
3. Role of the President:
The President of India plays a crucial role in the amendment process. After the amendment bill is passed by both Houses of Parliament, it is presented to the President for assent. The President must give assent to the bill, thereby making it a constitutional amendment. However, the President does not have the power to veto an amendment bill.
4. Judicial Review of Amendments:
The Supreme Court of India has the power of judicial review, meaning it can examine the validity of constitutional amendments. In the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Supreme Court established the doctrine of “basic structure,” holding that certain fundamental features of the Constitution cannot be amended. This limits the amending power of Parliament and protects the core principles of the Constitution. The exact scope of the “basic structure” doctrine remains a subject of ongoing debate and judicial interpretation.
5. Examples of Amendments:
Numerous amendments have been made to the Indian Constitution since its adoption in 1950. Some notable examples include the inclusion of Directive Principles of State Policy, the abolition of privy purses, and the introduction of the 73rd and 74th amendments establishing Panchayati Raj institutions and urban local bodies respectively. These amendments reflect the evolving needs and priorities of the nation.
Conclusion:
The Constitutional amendment procedure in India is a complex yet vital process that ensures both stability and flexibility. The requirement of different majorities for different types of amendments reflects a careful balance between the need for change and the preservation of the Constitution’s fundamental principles. The Supreme Court’s role in judicial review, particularly through the doctrine of basic structure, safeguards the core values of the Constitution. While the process has been subject to criticism regarding its potential for misuse, its overall effectiveness in adapting the Constitution to the changing needs of a diverse nation is undeniable. Moving forward, a transparent and participatory approach to the amendment process, coupled with a robust judicial oversight, is crucial to ensure that amendments reflect the will of the people and uphold the constitutional values of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. This will contribute to a more inclusive and just society, fostering holistic development and sustainable progress for all citizens.
UKPCS Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for UKPCS Prelims and UKPCS Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by UKPCS Notes are as follows:-- UKPCS Mains Tests and Notes Program
- UKPCS Prelims Exam 2024- Test Series and Notes Program
- UKPCS Prelims and Mains Tests Series and Notes Program
- UKPCS Detailed Complete Prelims Notes