Points to Remember:
- Definition of a Starred Question.
- Procedure for asking and answering Starred Questions.
- Purpose and significance of Starred Questions.
- Limitations and potential drawbacks.
Introduction:
A “Starred Question” is a specific type of question asked in parliamentary proceedings, particularly in systems following the Westminster model. These questions are marked with an asterisk (*) to indicate their importance and priority. They are generally addressed to ministers or other high-ranking officials of the government. The precise procedures and implications of Starred Questions can vary slightly depending on the specific parliamentary system (e.g., UK Parliament, Indian Parliament), but the core concept remains consistent: prioritizing important questions for immediate government response. The use of Starred Questions ensures accountability and transparency in government functioning.
Body:
1. Definition and Procedure:
A Starred Question is a written question submitted to the parliament in advance, requiring a direct oral answer from the relevant minister during a designated Question Hour. The question must be concise and specific, focusing on a particular policy, action, or decision of the government. The minister is expected to provide a detailed and substantive response. The questioner is usually given an opportunity for a brief supplementary question to clarify any ambiguities or seek further information. The entire exchange is recorded in the official parliamentary records.
2. Purpose and Significance:
The primary purpose of Starred Questions is to hold the government accountable to the legislature and, ultimately, the public. They provide a mechanism for parliamentarians to scrutinize government policies and actions, ensuring transparency and responsiveness. Starred Questions allow for public airing of concerns, facilitating informed public discourse and debate on important issues. They are a vital tool for opposition parties to challenge the government and highlight potential shortcomings or failures. Furthermore, they can bring urgent matters to the attention of the government, prompting immediate action.
3. Examples and Case Studies:
While specific examples require referencing particular parliamentary records (which are publicly available but extensive), we can illustrate the general application. For instance, a Starred Question might concern the government’s response to a natural disaster, the implementation of a new policy, or allegations of corruption within a government department. The minister’s response would then be subject to scrutiny by other parliamentarians and the media.
4. Limitations and Potential Drawbacks:
Despite their importance, Starred Questions have limitations. The number of questions that can be asked is often limited, leading to a prioritization process that might not always reflect the urgency or importance of all issues. Ministers can sometimes provide evasive or incomplete answers, limiting the effectiveness of the questioning. The time allocated for each question and supplementary question can be short, restricting in-depth exploration of complex issues. Finally, the impact of Starred Questions can be limited if the government chooses not to act on the information or concerns raised.
Conclusion:
Starred Questions are a crucial mechanism for parliamentary oversight and government accountability. They facilitate transparency, allow for public scrutiny of government actions, and provide a platform for raising urgent matters. While limitations exist regarding the number of questions, potential for evasive answers, and the time constraints, their overall contribution to democratic governance is undeniable. To enhance their effectiveness, parliaments should consider increasing the number of allotted questions, strengthening procedures for follow-up on ministerial responses, and ensuring adequate time for detailed questioning. A robust system of Starred Questions is essential for a healthy and functioning democracy, promoting good governance and upholding the principles of accountability and transparency. By strengthening this mechanism, we can further enhance the responsiveness of governments to the needs and concerns of their citizens.